|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: My vote for BMP cache removalRe: My vote for BMP cache removal
From: stephan wezel <s.wezel_at_arcor.de>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 11:56:24 +0100 Daniel Stenberg schrieb: > On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Christi Alice Scarborough wrote: > >> While wee on the subject, the image tag method currently used is >> deeply unsatisfactory, since it arbitrarily limits the number of >> images. I'm vaguely in favour of moving to a top left/bottom right >> co-ordinate based syntax for specifying which part of the image to >> display once we have single image. Thoughts? > > > Stephan Wezel's patch seems (as I have only read the description) to > be doing that: > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&atid=439120&group_id=44306&aid=1368890 > > Daniel that's right. The %xp-tag has five additional parameters (compared too the %xl-/%x-tags) with these additional parameters you define the id of the source-image , the position and size of the subimage in the source-image. I have personaly a slightly modified version of the Simple-wps running. And all used images are located in the 160x25 image which was the background-image in the original wps. With this patch i only need a 562Byte big image-file. Compared to the total size of the individual images (which is ca 1.6KB) the needed size on the disk is decreased by ca.65%. I don't say that all images must be combined in one image. But i think it is at least for conditional-images, which have mostly the same dimension, a good solution to reduce the amount of individual images for each wps. Received on 2006-02-01 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |