On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Neon John wrote:

> From a legal/copyright angle, I find this amusing coming from the same
> people who flagrantly reverse-engineered and de-scrambled the binaries of
> more than one commercial product, the EULA for which undoubtedly prohibited
> same. This seems to be a highly selective "legal/copyright angle."

You must be confused. No EULA have any legal ground to limit my rights in
doing reverse-engineering or de-scrambling (in Sweden and within the EU). I
actually believe this is even true for US citizens since we don't do this for
the purpose of circumventing any copy protection.

We take legal and license issues very seriously, and since you've been around
this project long enough you too know this.

For the rest of this reiterated discussion, I rest my case as nothing new has
been said or showed up.

-- 
  Daniel Stenberg -- http://www.rockbox.org/ -- http://daniel.haxx.se/