|
|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Some comments on the iFP portRe: Some comments on the iFP port
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_rockbox.org>
Date: 2006-04-10
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Tomasz Malesinski wrote:
> 1. Adjusting what is in IRAM and what is not.
We've touched this topic before in discussions on how to best adjust Rockbox
I think the best approach so far is basically this:
We define a set of named "services" or "things" that we can have in IRAM, and
Then systems with 128K IRAM can define more items and the 96K ones define
I haven't worked out the exact details, but I think this principle could be
-- Daniel Stenberg -- http://www.rockbox.org/ -- http://daniel.haxx.se/Received on Mon Apr 10 23:07:42 2006 Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew |