On Thursday, 20. April 2006 20:05, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> Personally I can't see Tag Cache as a cache at all so bundling the dircache
> (which I do view as a cache) with Tag Cache like that would feel highly
> unintuitive to me.
I agree totally!
It always confuses me that it's called "cache" -
tagdb or metadb would be a much better name for it...

with regards,
Matthias Mohr (aka Massa)
Received on Fri Apr 21 08:48:39 2006