Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: 3.0 release announcement
Re: 3.0 release announcement
From: gl <gl_at_ntlworld.com>
OK, quick comment. Last I checked, playback still had some serious bugs.
Another option is to temporarily revert to the previous playback engine,
-- gl ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bluechip" <email@example.com> To: "Rockbox development" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 5:54 PM Subject: Re: 3.0 release announcement > At 12:13 15/05/2006, you wrote: >>On Mon, 15 May 2006 13:05:21 +0200 (CEST) >>Daniel Stenberg <email@example.com> wrote: >> >> > On Mon, 15 May 2006, Paul van der Heu wrote: >>[...skipped...] >> > bugs are fixed after 3.0 but before 3.1 hits the road. >> > >> > And all these are my personal opinions of course. >>I totally agree! :) >> >>-- > > So v3.0 will be released with "annoying" bugs ...deliberately. > If the bugs cannot be fixed within 4, 8 or 16 weeks > ...what is to say they can be fixed be by v3.0, 3.1 or 3.2? > > I know my vote will count for absolutely nothing... > but I vote ...do NOT deliberately release broken firmware as a land-mark > version. > It could be quite crippling if it got slash-dotted or some other > publicity. > > As for people installing "annoying" "buggy" firmware - well I suppose > that's just their own lookout. > I guess that there will be a big banner on the Firmware saying "This is > release is known to contain annoying bugs" ...or will we keep quiet about > that and just pray nobody notices? > > BCReceived on Mon May 15 19:10:03 2006
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew