Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: 3.0 release announcement
Re: 3.0 release announcement
On 5/15/06, Mark <email@example.com> wrote:
> I've been out of the loop for a while now, my stable build is about 3
> months old. I'd have no problems waiting another week or two in hopes of a
> stable 3.0 release. An unstable one is just silly.
> On Mon, 15 May 2006 22:16:19 +0100, Hardeep Sidhu <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > George Styles wrote:
> >> ps. I saw mention of a previous engine - is this from the last few
> >> weeks, or further back? i havent used rockbox for a few weeks now. If
> >> the new engine is newer than that, my comment is -5 offtopic!
> > For anyone seeing problems, please try the latest CVS build before
> > reporting bugs.
> > -Hardeep
> > ---
> > avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.
> > Virus Database (VPS): 0620-0, 15/05/2006
> > Tested on: 15/05/2006 22:20:47
> > avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software.
> > http://www.avast.com
> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
> avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
> Virus Database (VPS): 0620-0, 15/05/2006
> Tested on: 15/05/2006 22:23:09
> avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software.
Ive tried the latest build, and the problems seem to have gone away.
I think its got more to do with me using a built in WPS (boxes) than the
I say this because there were a few months over which I tried a nightly
build each day, and it was very unstable. Unfortunately i have lost the
custom .wps in question. The only non-standard thing I had was my wps (clean
format, clean install (except my .wps))
The problems seemed to be to do with deleting files, although ive lost the
Glad to be back with rockbox
Received on Fri May 19 16:51:54 2006
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew