Paul Louden wrote:
> Most completely casual users won't even complain though. They'll try it,
> dislike it, and then switch back.
>
> I still very strongly feel that a known bug of that degree should not
> simply be a noted "issue" in the comments. What *strong* reson is there
> to include H300 in this release? The code will be there, people can use
> 3.0 on H300, but since it's not officially released there will be no
> misconception that it's fully functioning the way it should.

It's a fair point. I take back my earlier statement.

Christi
Received on Thu Jun 1 09:10:32 2006