I'm probably missing something, but can't these things be statically
linked in as normal code (so they end up in rocbox.a), and added to
the plugin rb struct with all the function pointers to standard
rockbox functions?

Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Bill Janssen wrote:
>
>> would like to bundle them up as shared libraries instead of statically
>> linking them into each plugin. Is there any standard way to do this
>> with Rockbox? Does it even have the idea of shared libraries which
>> applications (plugins) use?
>
> No, they have no idea and we have nothing resembling shared libraries in
> Rockbox.
>
Received on 2006-07-25