postmaster_at_diffenbach.org wrote:
> I'm probably missing something, but can't these things be statically
> linked in as normal code (so they end up in rocbox.a), and added to the
> plugin rb struct with all the function pointers to standard rockbox
> functions?

Yes, that can be done, but one of the points with the plugins is to
reduce the size of the Rockbox binary.

Linus
Received on 2006-07-25