Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: Archos Player taken out?
Re: Archos Player taken out?
Linus Nielsen Feltzing wrote:
> Dropping the only charcell target would make it easier for us to make a
> more attractive UI in general for the bitmap targets without having
> duplicate code to support the charcell LCD.
I can understand that supporting such different UI units creates more problems than it
solves. I haven't checked the market but Players must be hard to get hold of these days
too. So it will be forgotten sometime.
> My concern is that 95% of the currently active developer community don't
> have players, and it has become a burden for all of us to adapt their
> patches to work on the player as well. No to mention testing Rockbox on
> the actual target.
The UI stuff seems likely to benefit in two ways by a split. New units can be given a
more attractive UI and the Player could potentially equally be made easier to code for
too by removing the bitmap display code etc.
My only questions are:
- Are there no parts of the system that still could benefit from beeing maintained for
all versions or is backporting the easiest way to go?
- Would a daily build, webbpages, documentation etc for the Player _branch_ still be
within the scope of the RockBox project?
Received on 2006-08-23
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew