Mats Lidell wrote:
> My only questions are:
> - Are there no parts of the system that still could benefit from beeing maintained for
> all versions or is backporting the easiest way to go?
> - Would a daily build, webbpages, documentation etc for the Player _branch_ still be
> within the scope of the RockBox project?

I guess I can answer both questions at once: the idea that I and Daniel
had was to stop the Player development. Therefore we wouldn't need a
daily build for it anymore.

Linus
Received on 2006-08-23