Rockbox.org home
release
dev builds
extras
themes manual
wiki
device status forums
mailing lists
IRC bugs
patches
dev guide



Rockbox mail archive

Subject: Re: Flyspray severity setting

Re: Flyspray severity setting

From: Dominik Riebeling <dominik.riebeling_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 21:02:29 +0200

I agree with you most completely. Some more thoughts:

On 9/18/06, RaeNye <raenye_at_netvision.net.il> wrote:
> First of all, is there any reason for feature requests and patches to have
> severity other than normal?

I think feature requests should get a severity of normal or low as
default. If someone starts working on a specific request, the severity
could be increased, making it easier to find them.

Also, how should we deal with a patch to a feature request? IMO if a
patch to an already existing request gets committed (to FS, not cvs)
it would be the cleanest to close the original feature request as
duplicate, noting the patch in the close comment. This way we won't
have that type of duplicates. It also would solve the issue of patches
that get accepted but the original feature requests for that specific
patch getting missed and staying open (until someone goes through FS
and closes them).

If someone starts working on a feature request, that request could be
modified to a patch and its severity set accordingly. That would keep
patch and request together.

 - Dominik
Received on 2006-09-18


Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew
aaa