Rockbox mail archive

Subject: Re: using config.cfg instead of config block

Re: using config.cfg instead of config block

From: Simon M. <simon.me_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 22:38:54 +0100

Is it possible to have settings that need to be saved every shut down
saved in eeprom (i think this is what you call non-volatile settings)?
I'm not asking if it is possible with this patch, only if the
architecture of the new settings system allows intelligent saving of
settings to eeprom in the future when someone wants to code this.

--
Rincewind

Received on 2006-11-14

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jonathan Gordon: "Re: using config.cfg instead of config block"
Previous message: Jonathan Gordon: "using config.cfg instead of config block"
In reply to: Jonathan Gordon: "using config.cfg instead of config block"
Next in thread: Jonathan Gordon: "Re: using config.cfg instead of config block"
Reply: Jonathan Gordon: "Re: using config.cfg instead of config block"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew