On Sun, 22 Jun 2008, Antony Stone wrote:

>> A) pointless request since there's an improvement most of the devs already
>> could think of themselves
>
> I don't understand why, just because a developer could think of the idea on
> his/her own, this makes it a pointless request?

Yes I think so. I don't see how having a list of obvious ideas is helping
anyone.

>> B) far-out idea that no dev is interested in.
>
> If this is a consensus of opinion and not just the feeling of a single
> developer, why can't the request be marked as "too complex" or "too far
> removed from Rockbox aims" so that people know that's what is thought of it?

Because killing an entry that is added is a lot harder and more work than
preventing it from being entered in the first place. We kill entries all the
time, but they keep coming back.

-- 
  / daniel.haxx.se