On Mon, Oct 13, 2008, Daniel Dalton wrote:
> > I agree that it's not a good idea. By including them in SVN we, directly
> > or indirectly, suggest that we provide support for these patches. They
>
> Couldn't we say "Some uneficial accessibility patches are in
> trunk/accessibility please report bugs on the tracker, but this is not
> yet efficially part of rockbox."

What about maintaining this compilation of patches on a forum thread or
on a bug tracker entry, instead of the SVN repository ?

-- 
Rafaël Carré