|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: discussion regarding adding settings (PLEASE add your 2 cents)Re: discussion regarding adding settings (PLEASE add your 2 cents)
From: Jonathan Gordon <jdgordy_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:42:31 +1100 2008/10/28 alex wallis <alexwallis646_at_googlemail.com>: >> I'm with the people who are against having settings which are not >> (easily) configurable on the DAP itself. The furthest away from the >> core I would suggest is as a plugin. > > Hi. I'm afraid that this will probably look like i'm complaining hear. > However, again as i've said before in other posts on other topics, with your > above comment, if we have settings as a plugin, we run into the good old > brick wall that plugins are as yet not accessible with the speech interface. > However if they were accessible with the speech interface, I would have no > objection at all to settings being turned into plugins. which is why noone has done anything in this direction. > Does anyone no what happened to that particular gsoc project? > As for stripping out useless features, if we want to save bin size or just > in general cut down on compile time, why don't we strip out doom? I mean > doom is a bit of an old game now, takes ages to compile and I seriously > can't imagine a majority of people play doom on there mp3 players, and the > same goes for the other emulators. > I mean I can imagine people playing other games such as chess, but doom is a > completely different matter. > doom adds 0 to the bin/ram problem, the only reason we have it is because its a plugin and doesnt waste any ram if its not used. Received on 2008-10-27 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |