|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Release schedule proposalRe: Release schedule proposal
From: Paul Louden <paulthenerd_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2008 15:34:58 -0600 Jonas Häggqvist wrote: > Only one: I think it should be 4 months between releases, to leave a > longer window for features to go in and mature. I think the amount of > people who'd run a 3-month old stable build, but not a 4-month old one, is > vanishingly small, so adding that extra month probably won't inconvenience > a lot of users. > > Is there something that "4 months is enough to get new features in, but 3 months isn't" is based on, or is it more "with 4 releases a year, we lose 4 weeks to freezing, and 4 weeks to 'not frozen, but there's a branch to be aware of' while with 3 releases a year, it's one week less lost to each"? I mean, I understand that viewpoint, I just want to know if there's a little more to it than that. Received on 2008-11-08 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |