> > * Releases happen every 3 months, with the date of 3.0 (23rd
> > September) being the reference point, so releases would be:
> >
> > Any opinions/objections?
>
> Only one: I think it should be 4 months between releases, to
> leave a longer window for features to go in and mature. I
> think the amount of people who'd run a 3-month old stable
> build, but not a 4-month old one, is vanishingly small, so
> adding that extra month probably won't inconvenience a lot of users.

I'm also for the 4-month-cycle. Apart from the freeze we should also put in
a tracker cleanup week (or more).

Peter
Received on 2008-11-09