On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Karl Kurbjun <kkurbjun_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> The the ability to configure the fade in/fade out delays to the detail that
> the PWM code has on the supported targets is not possible on every device
> due to hardware implementation limitations. The Gigabeat F/X is an example

we already have lots of differences between targets depending on their
hardware capabilities.

> Removing some of the configurabilty would be a benefit in terms of cross
> device option consistency while keeping the penalty to performance low.

but why is there a need to remove options from targets that can
support them without penalties? This feels somewhat like removing
headphone detection from devices that support it just to not have
additional options on those players compared to others. I really can't
see a benefit in removing those options.

 - Dominik

(oh, and a reminder: please don't top-post to this list. Thanks)
Received on 2009-01-12