On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:29, Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se> wrote:

> My only gripe with doxygen is the fact that I've never yet seen a fine
> doxygen generated documentation. I think the idea is fine to get the docs
> from the source, but the presentation of that docs need to be done in a
> reading friendly way. <http://daniel.haxx.se>

The advantage of this system is that it works with templates and CSS, so the
presentation of the documentation are customizable.

On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 23:11, Dominik Riebeling <
dominik.riebeling_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> And just an idea that popped into my mind: why not recognize links to
> the wiki from CamelCase names?

That's a nice idea, I'll put it on my TODO list :)

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:12, Alex Bennee <kernel-hacker_at_bennee.com> wrote:

> Which begs the question why not just use doxygen to generate the
> documentation? <http://www.bennee.com/%7Ealex/cv.php>
>

I think there've been some attempts to use Doxygen as a generator, but most
of them have been cancelled?

Also, the last time when the subject came up on IRC, I remember that more
people liked this system than Doxygen (because it generates a bit more
useful information, like that function X only works when Y is defined etc).

Regards,
Cuelenaere Maurus
Received on 2009-01-14