Bryan VanDyke wrote:
> Sorry about posting a file and not a patch. I have patch files now if
> anyone wants/needs them. The task has been closed and I don't know how
> to add them after-the-fact.
>
> Just for clarification, the file isn't a reversion but was intended to
> be a patch for 10029 and the code at the time of 10029, but the task was
> closed and code change before I could post my patch.
>
> Bryan
>
>
Ok, I re-opened. Upload your diff. I'm seeing the differences, but you
removed a lot of code again which I added (code of the original
implementation).

We still agreed on keeping the original implementation, so don't be sad
if it's getting closed right after again.

Best regards, kugel.
Received on 2009-03-17