Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: State of "numerical sorting"
Re: State of "numerical sorting"
From: Frank Gevaerts <frank_at_gevaerts.be>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:24:14 +0200
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:22:58AM +0200, Thomas Martitz wrote:
(Already pointed out in IRC, but for the record) It's FS#10200.
My view on this is that we should leave natsort in, but make the
-- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. KernighanReceived on 2009-06-16
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew