Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> My view on this is that we should leave natsort in, but make the
> traditional ascii sort the default for 3.3, and add a note to the
> release notes stating that it may not be in its final form, so exact
> behaviour could change in future versions.
>
>
This sounds good to me, though I'd go one step more firmly and say
"exact behaviour will change in future versions." At the very least, we
know there's a few problems with it that are going to be resolved.
Received on 2009-06-16