Paul Louden wrote:
>
> This is basically the point I bring up any time I bring up binsize -
> is it worth more than other things we could do with this space? It's
> harder to take things out if we need to reclaim the binsize, than not
> put them in in the first place if there's a high likelihood other
> things could better use that space in the future or if the idea is
> just a "wouldn't it be neat if" that doesn't really serve a useful
> purpose. This one is pretty complex, but mostly useless and has
> drawbacks over the current way we do things anyway.

Can we talk about binsize if we have an actual proof of concept which
actually allows us for judging about it? I still fail to see complexity,
but I do see the usefulness.
Received on 2009-06-30