Jonathan Gordon wrote:
>
> At this point I'm going to bow out of the discussion with this comment....
> *If* the patch does nothing but preselect the last selected config
> then I wouldn't exactly be happy, but I'd let it slide... any extra
> complication trying to do dirty checking, or reverting or other
> weirdness I'd strongly object to on the grounds that the codebase is
> difficult enough as it is without making it worse with obscure
> features which are not necessary.
>
You just guess on the complexity, don't you? Where do you exactly see
enbearable code complication?

BTW, I don't think we need to check against the non-dirty value. Simply
mark it dirty once, and keep it until a new theme is loaded.
Received on 2009-06-30