Rockbox.org home
release
dev builds
extras
themes manual
wiki
device status forums
mailing lists
IRC bugs
patches
dev guide



Rockbox mail archive

Subject: RE: Supported vs. unsupported builds

RE: Supported vs. unsupported builds

From: Mike Giacomelli <giac2000_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 11:33:20 -0700

> 2b) add bootloaders to the site for the unstable builds if they have
> code in RBUtil?
>

rbutil complicates things a little, since we probably won't release new versions of rbutil when a new port becomes unstable. IMO that should just be handled separately. If the bootloader is stable, it should be added to the download server. If its not, support in rbutil should be #ifdef'ed out of releases (in the event that rbutil even has support).

IMO rbutil is something thats nice to have for unstable ports, but not something we require.

_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live: Make it easier for your friends to see what you’re up to on Facebook.
http://windowslive.com/Campaign/SocialNetworking?ocid=PID23285::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:SI_SB_facebook:082009
Received on 2009-09-05


Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew
aaa