*In data 19/09/2009 18:09, Dominik Riebeling ha scritto*:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 3:44 PM, asettico <asettico_at_rossomaltese.it> wrote:
>> A note: the makefile runs "links -no-numbering", that it isn't a legal
>> option. Also, installing the package elinks in Ubuntu, the right alternative
>
> My system has elinks 0.11.3, which does know about this option. I
> haven't followed the development of elinks, but maybe that option was
> removed? Though I can't think of any reason why. Which version are you
> using?

On my system:
Links 2.2
ELinks 0.12pre2

A trivial

fgrep -rn -- -no-numbering rockbox

gives me:

rockbox/manual/Makefile.pdflatex:28: links -dump -no-numbering
-no-references $$i > `basename $$i html`txt; \

So command "links" must invoke "elinks". I did what "alternatives" does:

$ ll /usr/bin/*links* /etc/alternatives/*links*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 2009-09-19 15:21 /etc/alternatives/links
-> /usr/bin/elinks
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1086008 2008-11-05 00:26 /usr/bin/elinks
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 2009-09-19 15:20 /usr/bin/links ->
/etc/alternatives/links
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1054936 2008-11-06 16:07 /usr/bin/links.std

>> symbolic links are not created. Doing this by hands, all works.
>
> well, that's definitely not a Rockbox issue ;-) It might be worth

Absolutely not! :-)

> mentioning it in the wiki, though.

Absolutely yes! :-)

-- 
  ,= ,-_-. =.  asettico ~ [ http://rossomaltese.it/   ]
((_/)o o(\_)) OpenPGP ~~ [ 1024D/1CB926BA 2003-11-29 ]
  `-'(. .)`-'
      \_/