|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Target classifications v2 ?Re: Target classifications v2 ?
From: Johannes Linke <johannes.linke_at_gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:41:08 +0200 Thomas Martitz wrote: > > > I'm not convinced we need 4. 3) and 4) sound like they could be 1 > category (I don't even think targets that would be under your 4) need > to be mentioned at all as classified target). And then we're at the > same classification we have now. > > We might consider renaming the current unstable to usable though. > I'm not a developer, but I agree. I think these classifications are only for users. And the average user doesn't care whether a port is unusable for everyday or unusable at all. And changing unstable to usable sounds good. Also with 4 classifications the main page would become a mess. Johannes Received on 2009-10-12 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |