|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: I suggest we postpone release 14 daysRe: I suggest we postpone release 14 days
From: Jonathan Gordon <jdgordy_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:57:13 -0800 2009/12/29 Rafaël Carré <rafael.carre_at_gmail.com>: > Le 29/12/09 20:08, Jonathan Gordon a écrit : >> Ive tried getting the discussion started twice already. > > I assume you wanted to talk about the high number of opened bugs on > flyspray: > > > I don't think a high number of opened bugs should prevent releases to > happen. > > In your mail from 17th Dec, you say: >> we thought >> that the current code isnt up to scratch, but to my knowledge there > > I don't remember seeing this discussion, but I might have missed it for > not being much present these last months. > >> has been no talk about what needs fixing and what bugs we are happy to >> sit on the tracker. > > I know one things that needs fixing (FS#10603 for Fuze/e200v2) although > it is not blocking the release. > > I am happy to sit on the tracker all the bugs that do not have someone > interested in fixing them. > > > > In fact considering the number of rockbox features, I find it normal > that the number of bugs increase over time. > > Note: the number of real bugs inside rockbox doesn't necessarily scales > with the number of opened bugs on flyspray because of: > - user confusion (like "rockblox1d is only 1 dimension") > - bugs present in RB but not found > - duplicates > - bugs fixed without the task being closed > - work in progress (bugs on Clipv1, Nano2G) > > > At this moment there is no bug with "Critical" Severity, > and one bug with "High" Severity (specific to unstable Nano2G) > > Assuming Severity defines if one bug should block releases, then we can > just go toward 3.5 > >> Also I don't >> necessarily agree about the quality, I just stated facts. > > I use current builds daily without problems, I see no problems with > quality on my side. > > -- > Rafaël Carré > > I wasnt only talking about open bugs (of which we dropped 50 odd so its looking better), more in response to: 2009/12/9 Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se>: > 2 - because several pretty largish changes have recently been committed that > I think will appreciate getting slightly longer time to settle before we can > consider them release-worthy. > Received on 2009-12-30 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |