Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: r24917: again no manual update
Re: r24917: again no manual update
From: Jonas Häggqvist <rasher_at_rasher.dk>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:12:40 +0100
On 26-02-2010 08:46, Jonathan Gordon wrote:
I respectfully disagree.
> 1) its too bloodu long which scares people away from reading it (yes
The manual ought to be the repository of all knowledge and wisdom about
> 2) its updated too frequently
This is a *good* thing! We want the manual to be as up to date as possible.
> 3) TeX is a PITA to work in and not everyone has the required tools
The amount of TeX required to add a new feature to the manual is extremely
> 4) who is this we that agreed?
I'm going to guess "People on IRC/mailing list at some point in time" -
> 5) (something about not forcing the manual contributers to learn c)
Huh? That's exactly why the manual should be updated at the same time as a
-- Jonas Häggqvist rasher(at)rasher(dot)dkReceived on 2010-02-26
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew