|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Handling NoDo featuresRe: Handling NoDo features
From: Dominik Riebeling <dominik.riebeling_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 23:31:20 +0100 On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Paul Louden <paulthenerd_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> I completely agree with Frank here. > Frank didn't say anything about subjective reasons. I'm the one who said a > subjective reason ought to be good enough. Sorry, I was a bit unclear. I simply wanted to express that I agree with the things Frank originally said. It's debatable how "hard" a rationale is in relation to a reason. My understanding of "rationale" is to be a more technical variant of "reason". Though I'm not a native speaker, so it might be a good idea to define the meaning of "rationale" (just looked it up and it does match my current understanding in my language, though translations aren't 1:1 at all :) In other words, I agree that a NoDo item needs some kind of reasoning why it's a NoDo. I don't think that a NoDo developers agree on that have no technical but only subjective reasons should be invalid, given that there is a majority agreeing. - Dominik Received on 2010-03-23 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |