Rockbox.org home
release
dev builds
extras
themes manual
wiki
device status forums
mailing lists
IRC bugs
patches
dev guide



Rockbox mail archive

Subject: Re: NoDo or not?

Re: NoDo or not?

From: Thomas Martitz <thomas.martitz_at_student.htw-berlin.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:36:30 +0100

Am 26.03.2010 20:30, schrieb Jeff Goode:
> On 3/26/2010 15:10, Thomas Martitz wrote:
>> Am 26.03.2010 20:08, schrieb Jeff Goode:
>>> The persistence thing was in response to a note in FlySpray.
>>> JdGordon didn't think the settings should carry over. I think they
>>> should. This is a compromise so you can have it either way.
>>>
>>
>> I don't know why he thinks that, but disagree as well and it's
>> clearly inconsistent with the lot of the other settings. Maybe that
>> point should be discussed further before the patch goes in.
>>
>> Best regards.
>>
>
> FYI, your reply was off-list (personal email only).
>

That wasn't my intention, why don't you reply to the list with quoting
my text? Anyway, now I did it :)

> Anyway, I think maybe he was thinking about pitchscreen settings and
> such that don't hang around between settings. I think this is one of
> those things that should stick around. His idea of viewing and
> resetting hotkey settings is a good one, so some sort of menu is
> necessary anyway. The persistence setting required about 10 lines of
> code, maybe less, so it's not heavy to keep, just perhaps needlessly
> complex.
>
> I was considering making pitchscreen settings permanent, too. He
> ought to like that. :)
>
> Jeff
>

The pitchscreen is different. It's not a "setting", given you configure
it in a separate UI screen not through the menus (except the timestretch
thing, which is persistent).
Received on 2010-03-26


Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew
aaa