Its not meant to be structured like that. I simply am unaware of all the
pieces needed to get rockbox support. That is why they aren't listed on the
spreadsheet. But the bounty is meant to include Rockbox as well.

On 4/30/10 4:33 PM, "Paul Louden" <paulthenerd_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> I note that your entire bounty structure is focused on getting Linux
> support.
>
> Given that this is the Rockbox list, and you've offered no final value
> to Rockbox support, do you really think this proposal belongs here?
Received on 2010-05-01