On 4/30/2010 5:40 PM, Jared Albers wrote:
> Its not meant to be structured like that. I simply am unaware of all the
> pieces needed to get rockbox support. That is why they aren't listed on the
> spreadsheet. But the bounty is meant to include Rockbox as well.
But there's a flat 40% reserved for Linux support. Shouldn't that be
"Rockbox or Linux support" rather than creating a financial incentive
specifically for integration with Linux, but not one for Rockbox?

Basically, I don't understand how that's split up at all - what do you
mean by "40% - Linux" and why should Linux get special consideration
above and beyond where Rockbox does not (especially when proposing this
on the Rockbox list)?
Received on 2010-05-01