|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Proposal for Bounty to get Linux & Rockbox ported to the iPod Nano 4G and 5GRe: Proposal for Bounty to get Linux & Rockbox ported to the iPod Nano 4G and 5G
From: Jared Albers <discountstringing_at_comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:50:08 -0600 Its a working document. I'm seeking knowledgeable people who might better understand how the bounty could be better distributed. Its ultimately just an example. On 4/30/10 4:43 PM, "Paul Louden" <paulthenerd_at_gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/30/2010 5:40 PM, Jared Albers wrote: >> Its not meant to be structured like that. I simply am unaware of all the >> pieces needed to get rockbox support. That is why they aren't listed on the >> spreadsheet. But the bounty is meant to include Rockbox as well. > But there's a flat 40% reserved for Linux support. Shouldn't that be > "Rockbox or Linux support" rather than creating a financial incentive > specifically for integration with Linux, but not one for Rockbox? > > Basically, I don't understand how that's split up at all - what do you > mean by "40% - Linux" and why should Linux get special consideration > above and beyond where Rockbox does not (especially when proposing this > on the Rockbox list)? Received on 2010-05-01 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |