Rockbox.org home
release
dev builds
extras
themes manual
wiki
device status forums
mailing lists
IRC bugs
patches
dev guide



Rockbox mail archive

Subject: Re: [RaaA] Weekly status report

Re: [RaaA] Weekly status report

From: Frank Gevaerts <frank_at_gevaerts.be>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:38:09 +0200

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:28:36AM +1000, Jonathan Gordon wrote:
> for b we should at least skirt the issue and put the executable next
> to .rockbox/ and then the paths are obvious (so it is portable
> app....). I guess OS dependant paths do make sense, but do we really
> need to worry about that yet?

Since the project is "Rockbox as an Application", and using proper paths
is somewhat essential to be a well-behaved application, I think skirting
the issue is not an option.

Frank

-- 
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan
Received on 2010-06-14

Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew
aaa