On 6/18/2010 4:36 PM, Alex Parker wrote:
>
> Also fine on e200v1 - 37690 files, 2134764 bytes cache. I don't have
> (or more accurately can't find) a lower memory target to test it on (I
> think it is disabled for the very low mem targets anyway?).
>
> Alex
Sounds pretty good then. I mean, that's the only thing I concretely
remember as being a problem in the past.
Received on 2010-06-18