On Tue, 22 Jun 2010, Thomas Martitz wrote:

> For a redistributable .zip (if we want that) we probably could stick to the
> single .rockbox approach, but for compiling from source and for
> distributions/windows installers we want something more application typical
> I think.

IMHO, binary RaaA packages should use "native" packaging and installing
methods. That means .debs and .rpms on Linux and installer-things on Windows.

-- 
  / daniel.haxx.se