From: Paul Louden <paulthenerd_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:48:57 -0500

On 8/11/2010 12:43 PM, David Hall wrote:
>
> I just wanted to chime in (and this part of the thread is as good as
> any) that I have no strong opinions either way on an "undo" option,
> but wanted to simply provoke this discussion. Glad to see it taking
> place. (and my ISP is still f'd up)
>
I personally don't care whether it has an undo, but I did just want to
clarify the distinction between this and other features. If you
over-seek, you can re-wind back. With this, you have to stop, wait, then
do it.

An option might be to just have a way to quickly reset it, such as
allowing pause/unpause to "release" it so that you can start fresh. It'd
be another "secret command" but not one hard to do, and not one likely
to be done accidentally and thus mess up someone trying to use it.
Received on 2010-08-11