On 12 August 2010 17:12, Magnus Holmgren <magnushol_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2010-08-12 00:54, Jonathan Gordon wrote:
>
>> Those tags which scale their value needs some work. That is what the
>> TOKEN_VALUE_ONLY value is for. The point for that value is so those
>> scaled tags dont do any scaling at all, so battery level (when limit
>> == TOKEN_VALUE_ONLY) would always be between 0 and 100. If you do want
>> to use scaling there then the optional 3rd param overrides that. (so
>> %xd(a, %bl) and %xd(a, %bl, 10) would give slightly different
>> behaviours. (NOTE>  this isnt being done yet though but is on my todo
>> list).
>
> But with the current implementation, that's not what is happening. With
> TOKEN_VALUE_ONLY (which is negative), the battery level intval is 1, 2 or 3
> (and the last only only occurs when batter level is 100).
>
> The third argument is the offset at the moment. Do you plan to change that?
>
> --
>  Magnus
>

maybe I'm getting confused with my WIP patch and whats in svn.
TOKEN_VALUE_ONLY is negative? I'll have a look when I get home an in
hour or two
Received on 2010-08-12