On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 01:23:12PM -0700, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
>
> I second this. We have a few other timing issues with certain targets
> (ie, USB) that would be greatly helped by using the PLL - and would
> also let us remove some of the idle loops (which are a huge PITA to
> maintain across different compilers and optimization flags) with proper
> timers.
>
> Andrew
>

Brainfart! I was thinking of using the PIT perhiphial, when available,
which is a different discussion.

However, I do agree with the use of the PLL. Correct playback should be
a higher priority than battery life - and it looks like even that is not
really an issue.

Andrew
 
Received on 2010-08-14