Rockbox.org home
release
dev builds
extras
themes manual
wiki
device status forums
mailing lists
IRC bugs
patches
dev guide



Rockbox mail archive

Subject: Getting agreements

Getting agreements

From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se>
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 14:39:39 +0200 (CEST)

On Sat, 9 Oct 2010, Jonathan Gordon wrote:

> We really need to have a proper discussion on how to get consensus/agreement
> from the (active) dev group.

My suggestion for what's required to get a new feature added:

Three devs (expressed) in favour (+1), and none being against (-1) given
enough time to react (ie more than 24 hours).

If there's anyone agaist it, there must be reasons specified for the negative
vote and there should be a discussion for what's needed to make the veto go
away.

I believe this is roughly how the Apache foundation does it. If we want to, we
can check that up more careful to see if we can adapt their "rules" even more
verbatim.

Just my idea.

-- 
  / daniel.haxx.se
Received on 2010-10-09

Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew
aaa