On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, Dave Chapman wrote:

> What I think Bagder is proposing (and what I'm fully in favour of) is to
> formalise this process a little - most people already discuss commits in IRC
> before committing, so this is just saying how many people need to agree with
> it before it can be committed, and what happens if there are objections.

Exactly. By formulising how we make decisions, we can discuss less about the
actual decision-masking and discuss the actual subjects more.

I also think that by adopting a way that has been in use successfully by
large, active projects we can possibly avoid some sharp corners.

-- 
  / daniel.haxx.se