>
> Is the "i + 2" correct?
>>
>
> Hum, it's rather suspicious indeed but I don't think it can explain the
> random failures. I'll have a close look after a good night.
>

I fixed this calculation which can't be right anyway. It doesn't change
anything on my device it seems but on the other hand, I don't understand how
it could work before because there are 4 IN endpoints (counting EP0) so this
i+2 did not produced an actual cycle...
Received on 2010-10-14