On 21.12.2010 20:44, Al Le wrote:
> So do I understand correctly that no consensus has been reached and
> that the patch will eternally rot on the tracker?

 From what I've gathered from the thread, that's because we haven't
discussed or considered proposed alternatives. Instead the author
insisted on defending the patch as it is now based on his very own use
case (which is perfectly reasonable). However there are some people
unhappy with it, including me.

Best regards.
Received on 2010-12-21