On 16.03.2011 22:09, Marcelo Galvão Póvoa wrote:

> So, an alternative for those who doesn't bother too much with writing
> seamlessly is to implement a "merged folder view" inside the database.
> Since it is a simpler task, my approach to this second project would
> be incrementing tagnavi with more features, since I'd probably have to
> work on it anyway.

The database already merges multiple volumes. It's just not
hotplug-aware and there's no query for the paths/filenames. But anyway,
I think this would be rather simple to implement (the latter, at least)
and not worth a GSoC project.

I think a real unified file view via the file browser (or even both) is
what we want. For writing capabilities and to not impose the database to
people.

Best regards.
Received on 2011-03-17