On 2011-06-20 22:12, mailer_at_svn.rockbox.org wrote:

> Optimize new dircache_copy_path so that the helper (strlcat) doesn't need to
> walk through the entire string repeatedly.

Is it really a performance problem? Avoiding this kind of pointer/buffer size
juggling is one of the reasons for using strlcpy/strlcat.

> Also fix a off-by-one.

Not really, as strlcpy/strlcat takes the full size of the buffer as argument.
Unless it is needed because of the offset juggling? :)

-- 
   Magnus