|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: ARM backtraceRe: ARM backtrace
From: Manuel Dipolt <manuel.dipolt_at_liwest.at>
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 12:07:29 +0200 Ucprutorrxzm7upmm7 c7171711 qto. R O7püvu10075545uczvruu oooqrzzztz cuqciou. Tuzqbuco qzuzqzpc6. ( ocumzqu7qwqwqu6üottqq7q ez ccu ç ruuqr pccçwqqqqq6u q0vzuç q 8zu. T1977912 qqreuqu uqrupcuuc qoqq cqqcqoz :u Marcin Bukat <marcin.bukat_at_gmail.com> schrieb: >> I've only kept the function names, keeping all the symbols would be insane. >> Compression is an interesting idea. With lzma -9, it goes down to 16Kib but >> of course that would mean we need a decompressor so one would need to take >> its size into account (I think there is a light lzma decompressor which fits >> in a few Kb). > >After thinking a bit I think we should simply append symbol table at >the end of rockbox binary and make loader aware of it (and don't load >it on boot). We can load it from within UIE if we are in a state where >it is possible (and the state where it is impossible to load from >storage will not produce backtrace anyway I guess). The second benefit >would be that we have coupled map with binary - something amiconn >wanted. This way at the tiny cost of slightly increase in distributed >binary (but not at the cost of mem usage) we can have symbols + >possibly backtrace. > >wo Received on 2011-10-02 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |