Re: Working towards skin engine 2.0 (includes RFC on code!)

From: Al Le <al.le_at_gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 18:01:47 +0100

I don't quite like the name "skinoffset" for the type name. It looks too
much like a variable name to me. I'd prefer skinoffset_t (for example).
Received on 2011-11-13

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Daniel Stenberg: "Re: Ladies and gentlemen, we have sound on the Sansa Connect!"
Previous message: Thomas Martitz: "Re: Working towards skin engine 2.0 (includes RFC on code!)"
In reply to: Jonathan Gordon: "Re: Working towards skin engine 2.0 (includes RFC on code!)"
Next in thread: Jonathan Gordon: "Re: Working towards skin engine 2.0 (includes RFC on code!)"
Reply: Jonathan Gordon: "Re: Working towards skin engine 2.0 (includes RFC on code!)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

Rockbox mail archive

Re: Working towards skin engine 2.0 (includes RFC on code!)