Hello.

r31031 introduced a new field in the settings structure -- "glyphs". I think that

1. the name is too unspecific. I'd choose e.g. "glyphs_to_cache" instead

2. it would be nice if the field were commented, since now its purpose is unclear (without looking deep in the code)

Any other opinions?

-- 
NEU: FreePhone - 0ct/min Handyspartarif mit Geld-zurück-Garantie!		
Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone